5.56 NATO Ammunition Variants



Introduction:

First adopted in the early 60's for use in the United States' new M16 rifle, the 5.56x45mm round, now referred to as 5.56 NATO, has become one of the most prolific cartridges on Earth. Originally developed by Remington as the .223 Remington cartridge, it has been iterated over decades to add the effectiveness and results desired by today's modern militaries. Aside from specialty loadings like tracers, there are three main loadings of 5.56 NATO that are currently in use: M193, M855, and M855A1. Each loading was developed to meet certain requirements for wounding potential and penetration. I'll go into each round and try and highlight some of their unique qualities. 

Details:

Source: https://magtechammunition.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/556A-cut.jpg


We'll start with the simplest round, M193. M193 is just your basic 55 grain, full metal jacket (FMJ) round. The M193 bullet is comprised of a lead slug with a copper jacket. The advantage to this round is that it's very cheap to manufacture, and provides adequate wounding capability and penetration for most applications. This is pretty close to the .223 Remington round that was originally developed, but there are some differences. Dimensionally they're identical, however, M193 Ball ammunition is loaded to a higher pressure than its civilian counterpart. This means that 5.56 ammunition in general should only be used in firearms that are designed to handle it. 


M855 Ball ammunition is significantly different from M193. The M855 round was originally developed by Belgium as the SS109 cartridge. It is a 62 grain, copper-jacketed bullet, with a steel penetrator in the tip with a lead plug behind it. This significantly improves the penetration of the round, while also creating a bullet that fragments in soft targets. M855 rounds are colloquially called "green tips" due to the fact that M855 rounds are distinguished from other rounds by the green paint on each bullet. 


Because they contain a steel penetrator, many indoor ranges will forbid the use of M855 Ball ammunition, for fears of ricochets and damage to backstops. 
 
M855A1 is the latest and greatest iteration for 5.56 NATO, and is the most interesting in my opinion. M855A1 was born out of a desire to create a lead-free "green" round that is also has greater penetration capability. The round is comprised of a hardened steel tip/penetrator, with a copper slug around and behind it. 

Source: https://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/M80A1070616-009_zpspcyumvzr.jpg
The M855A1 provides really good penetration as well as fragmenting ability. Upon impacting a soft target, the copper jacket/slug strip off the steel penetrator and fragment, creating a significant wound. Part of the reason the round was developed was to provide greater penetration for use against opposing forces wearing body armor. This sounds like a good idea, until you see that the round doesn't seem to be able to penetrate the latest Russian military body armor plates:

Additionally, there are complaints of the hardened steel tip causing damage to soldiers' rifles in the field, specifically their feed ramps. So all in all, there are still some bugs to be worked out with the latest round, and there already workarounds being distributed to soldiers in the field, such as different magazine followers. 

Conclusion:

Overall, the 5.56 NATO round has, much like the M16 and its variants, been battle-proven and continuously improved over its many decades of service. However, due to its shortcomings at the ranges encountered by many troops in Afghanistan, the military is actively seeking a replacement round that can fit the bill. However, the range and weight requirements are not easy to beat, so the 5.56 could conceivably remain the standard round for the military for many years to come. 


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Defense Distributed, DEFCAD, and Deterrence Dispensed.

Image
Source Introduction: The world of DIY gunsmithing has exploded in the past few years. Born out of ever-expanding gun control legislation, the ability of the people to build their own somewhat-effective firearms outside of government control has become an entire wing of the firearms community. This has evolved from rudimentary slam-fire pipe shotguns and single shot pistols, to 3D printed AR-15 lower receivers and pistol caliber carbines that use no regulated parts at all. In some ways, 3D printed firearms and so-called "ghost guns" function as a middle finger to the government. Groups, both centralized and decentralized, have popped up across the internet with one common mission, to render gun control obsolete.  Details: Defense Distributed: This project really was catapulted into the mainstream by Cody Wilson and Defense Distributed. Now, Cody Wilson definitely has a questionable past, but his work on Defense Distributed paved the way for boatloads of innovation in the 3D Pr...
Read more

3D Printed Guns

Image
Introduction:  3D printing opened up opportunities for hobbyists to develop and create whatever they wanted. The technology has evolved and progressed to include things such as carbon-fiber impregnated polymers, metal inserts, and UV resin. 3D printing technology has expanded to the field of firearms.In fact, there is now an entire subculture of the gun community dedicated to the progression and development of 3D printed firearms. I'm going to do my best to give a brief overview of the really interesting things that have come out of the 3D printed gun community, as well as go into some of the controversy surrounding 3D printed firearms and what they mean for the 1st and 2nd Amendments. Details: 3D printed firearms tend to come in a couple variations. First, there are the firearms that have 3D printed components, but incorporate many different crucial firearm components that aren't regulated in many instances. This would include, for example, 3D printed glock frames th...
Read more

Rotating Bolt, Tilting Bolt, and Roller-Delayed Blowback

Image
Introduction: Modern semi-automatic rifles typically operate through one of three locking systems, with only a few exceptions. These systems are rotating bolt, tilting bolt, and roller-delayed lockups. The lockup of the rifle is largely dependent on the design goals of the rifle. Aspects of certain systems may be preferred when they provide distinct advantages over others. I'll do my best to give an overview of how each locking system works, as well as go over some of the pros and cons of each one. I currently only have access to rotating bolt and tilting bolt rifles, so those two may be more picture-heavy than the roller delayed. Enjoy, and thanks for reading. Details: Rotating Bolt: The first locking system we're going to go over is probably the most common one used in modern day rifles. This is, of course, the rotating bolt. Although there are variations between semi-automatic, rotating bolt rifles, the lockup generally functions the same.  AKM-Type Fron...
Read more